Prospective surrogates increasingly use ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI platforms to research agencies before visiting any individual website. They ask questions like "which surrogacy agencies are best for surrogates" and receive AI-generated answers recommending specific agencies. Arcalea tracked 73 such prompts across four platforms to measure which agencies appear in those answers.
The agencies winning
on Google and the agencies
winning in AI are not the same companies.
Arcalea ran 73 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude to measure which surrogacy agencies appear in AI-generated answers to prospective surrogates. The findings reveal a fundamental split, and a major opportunity for agencies on the wrong side of it.
AEO + SERP
AI composite
divergent leaders
"surrogate pay"
Four quadrants.
Most agencies are in the wrong one.
Arcalea maps every agency by its AI composite score (vertical axis) against its Google search presence (horizontal axis). The quadrant an agency lands in determines its growth trajectory in an AI-first search environment.
Winning on both channels. These agencies will compound their lead as AI traffic grows; they're already the answer wherever prospective surrogates search.
Winning in AI despite limited traditional search presence. These agencies have cracked the AEO signal set (entity clarity, structured content, third-party mentions) without the backlink profile Google rewards.
Winning on Google today, but invisible to the prospective surrogates who start their search on ChatGPT or Perplexity. These agencies face the highest structural risk as AI search adoption accelerates.
Limited presence on Google and AI. The path forward requires investment in both channels simultaneously: entity clarity, structured content, and traditional SEO fundamentals.
What separates the agencies
AI cites from the ones it ignores.
The gap between leaders and laggards in the surrogacy AEO index is structural, not accidental. These four dimensions explain most of the variance in AI citation rates.
| Dimension | Leaders | Laggards | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AI answer citation rate
|
3–4 mentions per 10 queries
|
0–1 mentions per 10 queries
|
3–4× visibility difference
|
|
Structured data coverage
|
FAQPage + Organization + Service schemas
|
Title tag only
|
Full schema stack vs. none
|
|
Content depth on key queries
|
2,000+ word definitive guides
|
Service page only (<500 words)
|
Thin content = AI exclusion
|
|
E-E-A-T signals
|
Staff credentials, accreditation, trust signals
|
Generic "about us" content
|
Trust signal gap
|
Three things the data tells you.
The surrogacy AEO landscape has a structure that will compound over the next 18 months. Here is what that structure means.
Of the 15 agencies in the index, exactly one, Circle Surrogacy, earns strong composite scores in both AI-generated answers and Google search. Every other agency is winning on one channel and losing on the other. That single agency is positioned to compound its lead as AI search adoption continues.
Growing Generations holds the second-highest AEO composite in the index at 0.43. It has virtually no Google top-10 presence for the keywords that drive surrogate applicants. This is the clearest evidence that the mechanisms AI engines use to select sources are fundamentally different from what drives Google rankings.
The queries "how much do surrogates get paid" (2,200 monthly searches), "surrogate pay," and "surrogate mother pay" attract prospective surrogates at the moment of highest conversion intent. ConceiveAbilities leads several of these in Google. The agency that owns these queries in AI answers as well captures the full applicant funnel.
The queries that matter most
for surrogate recruitment.
All 73 prompts are anchored to real Ahrefs search volume data. These are the queries prospective surrogates are actually asking, in Google and, increasingly, in AI platforms.
15 agencies ranked.
Google vs. AI split analysis.
Full keyword map.
The complete report includes all 15 agency composite rankings, platform-by-platform breakdown, the full SERP vs. AEO quadrant analysis, keyword coverage matrix, and specific AEO implementation recommendations for surrogacy agency marketing teams.
AEO in the surrogacy industry, explained
Google rewards domain authority, link equity, and keyword optimization. AI engines reward entity clarity, structured content (FAQPage schema), answer-first formatting, and third-party citations. An agency can hold the top Google position while being invisible in ChatGPT responses if its content is not structured for AI extraction. Several top Google-ranked agencies in Arcalea's index earned near-zero AI composite scores.
Circle Surrogacy is the only agency in Arcalea's index that achieves strong performance on both Google and AI, the sole Digital Leader. Circle's AI visibility is driven by strong entity signals across platforms, answer-first content that AI engines extract easily, and organic mentions across third-party sources that AI engines treat as credibility signals.
An AI Darling is an agency that earns strong AI visibility despite limited traditional Google presence. Growing Generations holds the second-highest AEO composite score (0.43) while having only extended SERP presence. AI Darlings typically have strong entity signals and well-structured content (the signals AI engines prioritize), even without the backlink profiles that drive Google rankings.
Compensation keywords are the highest-conversion query category in the surrogacy index. Queries like "how much do surrogates get paid" (2,200 monthly searches), "surrogate pay," and "surrogate mother pay" attract prospective surrogates at the moment of highest intent. Agencies that own these queries in both Google and AI answers capture the full prospective surrogate funnel.
The highest-impact improvements are: FAQPage schema on key pages answering surrogate questions (eligibility, compensation, process), answer-first content that directly addresses what prospective surrogates ask AI platforms, consistent entity signals across the agency website and third-party sources, and presence on forums and community platforms that AI engines cite as human-truth sources.